Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search

 http://submit-circres.ahajournals.org

Authorship Responsibility and Copyright Transfer Agreement Form

Instructions to Authors

(revised November 2009)

RECENT SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN THE GUIDELINES ARE HIGHLIGHTED THROUGHOUT

HOW TO CONTACT THE JOURNAL

Address all correspondence to the Circulation Research Editorial Office:
Roberto Bolli, M.D.
Editor-in-Chief, Circulation Research
3355 Keswick Rd, Main Bldg 103
Baltimore, MD 21211
Phone: 410-327-5005
Fax: 410-327-9322
E-mail: circulation.research{at}circresearch.com
Online submission: http://submit-circres.ahajournals.org

Editorial Scope. Circulation Research is a forum for fundamental, mechanistic research of relevance to the cardiovascular system from various disciplines including biochemistry, biophysics, cellular biology, molecular biology, genetics, pathology, physiology, and pharmacology. The journal publishes manuscripts of the highest quality pertaining to basic cardiac and vascular biology and encourages the submission of work that uses state-of-the-art approaches to illuminate mechanisms of human disease. A special welcome is extended to translational research and to clinical research that yields fundamental insights; studies in humans or human tissues that advance our understanding of the basis of disease and the mechanism of therapies are an area of particular emphasis.

Circulation Research is an official journal of the American Heart Association and is the official journal of the Council on Basic Cardiovascular Sciences of the American Heart Association. Circulation Research is published as a print journal with 24 issues per year.

Review Process.  The review process at Circulation Research is rapid. An editorial decision is usually made in <20 days for Regular Articles and in 7 days for Brief Ultrarapid Communications (vide infra).

For the month of October 2009, the average time from submission to first decision for all original research papers submitted to Circulation Research was 11.9 days.

Manuscripts submitted to Circulation Research are examined by the editors, who usually recruit three expert reviewers. Papers are carefully evaluated in terms of novelty, importance, methodology, and broad interest to the readership (vide infra). When appropriate, articles are also subjected to statistical review. Decisions are communicated by email. The editors will not discuss a decision regarding a manuscript over the phone. All rebuttals must be submitted in writing to the editorial office. The editorial policy of Circulation Research is not to respond to pre-submission inquiries. The Editors of Circulation Research will not reply to emails from potential authors inquiring if their manuscript or proposed manuscript topic is suitable for the journal. Authors should submit their manuscripts for formal peer review after following all of the guidelines listed in these Instructions to Authors.

Criteria for Publication in Circulation Research. The mission of Circulation Research is to publish new information that constitutes an important conceptual advance vis-à-vis existing knowledge. Accordingly, the main criteria for acceptance are conceptual novelty, importance, and soundness of methodology. Priority is given to work that provides substantial new mechanistic insights into cardiovascular biology and disease. The editors also take into account whether a manuscript is of interest to the broad readership of Circulation Research. Even when the methodology is valid, significant novelty and impact are a sine qua non for acceptance. Thus, studies that are well designed, well presented, methodologically sound, flawlessly executed, even mechanistically focused, but have low potential impact (e.g., they address a narrow field or have limited implications) and/or little conceptual novelty (e.g., they are variations or extensions of previous ideas, or merely incremental advances vs. previous work) are generally not published. Similarly, manuscripts that are otherwise outstanding but lack breadth of appeal (i.e., they are of interest to a very narrow segment of the readership) are usually not published.

ARTICLE TYPES     ONLINE SUBMISSION GUIDELINES     MANUSCRIPT REVISIONS     JOURNAL POLICIES

ARTICLE TYPES

Note the length restrictions and other eligibility criteria listed below. Word limits include all sections of the manuscript: text, figure legend(s), table(s), and references.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLES

Except for New Methods (vide infra), Original Research Articles should provide substantial new mechanistic insights into cardiovascular biology in health and disease. Circulation Research publishes several types of manuscripts under the rubric of Original Research Articles - a diverse portfolio that is intended to meet the various needs of authors. A brief description of each manuscript type and its length limits follows:

Regular Articles:  Text limit: 6,000 words; Display Item limit: 8 Figures and/or Tables. Published in print and online. An editorial decision is usually rendered in <20 days; in 2008, the average time from submission to first decision for Regular Articles was 18.9 days.

NEW: Policy on Length of Regular Articles.  The editors recognize that flexibility in article length is necessary because some papers of great impact are unavoidably comprehensive and cannot be compressed into the standard 6,000-word/eight-display items limit without a significant loss of quality. Authors of such articles have two options: i) publishing part of their manuscript online (as an Online Supplement), so as to keep the print version within the standard limit of 6,000 words and eight display items, or ii) publishing the entire paper in the print version (except for the detailed Methods section, which is published online) and paying for the extra pages. The latter option is offered for those authors who do not wish to divide their papers between print and online version.

If the length of the manuscripts exceeds 6,000 words and eight display items, and if in the editors’ judgment the paper cannot be compressed into the standard space limits without loss of quality, the authors will be asked to choose between these two options. If the authors choose the extended print version option, they must provide written assurance that they will cover the costs of the pages and/or display items that are in excess of the standard limits. Page charges for publication in Circulation Research are $70 per printed page for the pages included in the standard 6,000-word and eight-display items limit. When a manuscript exceeds these limits, a charge of $425 for every 1,000 words over the 6,000 word limit will be assessed. The regular charge of $70 per page applies as well. No word or display item limits apply to the Online Supplement, which can include supporting data and/or expanded text to offset the limits on the print version. Such online supplementary information can be cited in the print version as appropriate.  Note that the option of an extended print version applies only to Regular Articles; Short Communications and BURCs are excluded.

NEW: Short Communications: Text limit: 2,500 words.  Display Item limit: 4 figures and/or tables. Published in print and online.

The purpose of this new category is to provide an avenue for publishing papers that are more narrowly focused than Regular Articles but are still definitive and scientifically rigorous. The review time for these papers will be similar to that for Regular Articles; the only difference between Regular Articles and Short Communications is the length of the manuscript.

NEW: Brief Ultrarapid Communications (BURCs): Text limit: 2,500 words. Display Item limit: 4 figures and/or tables. Published in print and online.

The purpose of this new category is to provide an extremely rapid decision (within 7 days) on papers of unusual impact. BURCs are an appropriate format for manuscripts that are of outstanding interest to the readership, report definitive observations, but have a relatively narrow scope. Less comprehensive than Regular Articles but still scientifically rigorous, BURCs present seminal findings that have the potential to open up new avenues of research.

These manuscripts will be handled in an accelerated fashion. Within seven days of submission, authors will receive a “yes/no” decision; detailed comments by the referees will not be available. If the editors and reviewers deem a revision to be necessary, this will consist only of minor edits (changes in the text and/or minor changes in the figures), and authors will have only five days to revise and resubmit. Like other Original Contribution Articles, BURCs will be published online ahead of print 7-14 days after acceptance; thus, the total time from submission to publication of BURCs will be 14-21 days if no revision is needed and 19-26 days if a revision is needed.

BURCs have the same length restrictions as Short Communications, but their review is faster. A brief letter to the editor explaining the importance of the findings and the reason for requesting accelerated publication should accompany the manuscript.

NEW: New Methods in Cardiovascular Biology:  Text limit: 6,000 words; Display Item limit: 8 figures and/or tables. Published in print and online.

This new category consists of papers that describe enabling technologies that may have a broad impact - new and important research tools and techniques with the potential to transform research practice and to be useful to a broad spectrum of investigators. Authors should provide a detailed description of the technology and discuss its conceptual underpinning, strengths and limitations, and potential applications in cardiovascular biology. At least one example of application of the new methodology to a specific question relevant to the cardiovascular system should be provided.

INVITED ARTICLES

Circulation Research publishes several types of manuscripts under the rubric of Invited Articles. In general, these articles are commissioned by the editors, but unsolicited submissions will also be considered for publication. A brief description of each manuscript type and its length limits follows:

Editorials: Text limit: 2,000 words. Display Item limit: 2  figures and/or tables.  Featured in print and online. All editorials are commissioned by the editors.

Reviews:  Text limit: 12,000 words. Display Item limit: 8 figures and/or tables. Featured in print and online. Most Reviews are commissioned by the editors; however, unsolicited Reviews will be considered.

NEW: News & Views:  The purpose of this new category is to appraise the readership of important new developments in cardiovascular research. Generally 1-2 pages in length and published either monthly or bi-weekly, News & Views features short reports of up-to-date science news of broad general interest authored by a science writer (including summaries of important new discoveries and international news), columns prepared by scientific thought leaders, highlights of basic and translational science presented at AHA meetings (e.g., Annual Sessions, BCVS Council meeting), commentaries and historical perspectives by leading cardiovascular scientists, discussion of issues relevant to early career investigators, and columns prepared by the editors.

NEW: Personal Reflections on Discoveries in Cardiovascular Biology: Length limit: 4,000 words;  Display Item limit: 4  figures and/or tables. Featured in print and online.

This new category consists of autobiographic essays written by leading scientists who narrate the circumstances, insights, and emotions surrounding seminal discoveries that they have made. Unlike typical reviews, these articles are personal and reflective, featuring a blend of scientific, autobiographic, and emotional content. It is hoped that through these articles, the readers can learn how scientific breakthroughs actually happen.
 
NEW: Controversies in Cardiovascular Research.  Featured in print and online.

This new category consists of back-to-back articles arguing opposing points of view on a topic of broad current interest.  Each discussant writes a brief Position Paper arguing a point of view (word limit, 2,000; Display Item limit, 2 figures and/or table), and a brief response to the opposing Position Paper (word limit: 1,000). The two Position Papers and the two responses are published together in the same issue. In selected cases where multiple points of view exist, more than two discussants may participate in the Controversy. All Controversies are commissioned by the editors.

NEW: Basic Implications of Clinical Observations:  Length limit: 6,000 words. Display Item limit: 8 figures and/or tables.  Featured in print and online.

The purpose of this new category is to discuss the mechanistic and pathophysiological questions that are raised by clinical/epidemiological observations. These articles address clinical studies or clinical topics that are clearly important for patients but where the basic biological mechanism remains elusive. The central question is, “What is the basic mechanism behind this clinical observation?” Usually coauthored by a clinician and a basic scientist, these articles highlight the importance of clinical studies and observations and then point out potential avenues for exploration at the basic level that could illuminate the mechanism of the clinical data. Basic Implications discuss both specific clinical studies and general clinical topics. It is hoped that these articles will stimulate new ideas for basic research projects. All papers in this category are commissioned by the editors.

NEW: Emerging Science: Text limit: 4,000 words. Display Item limit: 4 figures and/or tables.  Featured in print and online.

This new category consists of brief commentaries, published on an occasional basis, that highlight areas of research that are still too preliminary for a full review but are at the cutting edge of cardiovascular research. Emerging Science articles are commissioned by the editors; however, unsolicited articles will be considered.

NEW: Special Articles and Perspectives: Text limit: 6,000 words. Display Item limit: 6 figures and/or tables.  Featured in print and online.

This new category consists of articles that highlight and discuss issues of special interest to the readership. Special Articles and Perspectives will be written by leaders in the cardiovascular research community and will be published occasionally on an ad hoc basis. All articles are commissioned by the Editors.

OTHER FEATURES

Letters to the Editor: Text limit:  1,000 words; No display items allowed. Published online only.

Letters are opinion pieces on work published in Circulation Research and are reviewed by the editors to establish scientific decorum, overall level of interest to the readership, clarity, and appropriateness as contributions to the scientific literature. The authors should state clearly and succinctly their opinions, citing appropriate evidence to support them. Criticisms and disagreements must be articulated with respectful and professional language. Personal feelings, personal reactions, or personal issues are not appropriate content for Letters and will not be published. Replies are routinely solicited in advance from the authors of articles addressed. Letters to the Editor (and replies, which are also published as Letters) will appear online only. Letters to the Editor may not exceed 1,000 words in length. Figures and tables are not permitted. Citations should follow journal style

ONLINE SUBMISSION GUIDELINES

PLEASE NOTE SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN THE GUIDELINES, HIGHLIGHTED BELOW.

Title Page

The title page (page 1) should contain these elements:

Abstract and Key Words

Abbreviations

Text

Use SI units of measure in all manuscripts. For example, molar (M) should be changed to mol/L; mg/dL to mmol/L; and cm to mm. Units of measure previously reported as percentages (ie, hematocrit) are expressed as a decimal fraction. Measurements currently not converted to SI units in biomedical applications are blood and oxygen pressures, enzyme activity, H+ concentration, temperature, and volume. The SI unit should be used in text, followed by the conventionally used measurement in parentheses.

Methods

Acknowledgments

Sources of Funding

Disclosures

References

Patel VA, Zhang Q-J, Siddle K, Soos MA, Goddard M, Weissberg PL, Bennett MR. Defect in insulin-like growth factor-1 survival mechanism in atherosclerotic plaque-derived vascular  smooth muscle cells is mediated by reduced surface binding and signaling. Circ Res. 2001;88:895-902.

Gourdie RG, Litchenberg WH, Eisenberg LM. Gap junctions in heart development. In: DeMello WC, Janse MJ, eds. Heart Cell Communication in Health and Disease. Boston, Mass: Kluwer; 1998:19-44.

Figures

Tables

Cover Figures 

Significance and Novelty

Online Supplement

a. Detailed Methods (PDF file format) - required
b. Supplemental Figures and Figure Legends (PDF file format) - optional
c. Supplemental Tables and supporting information (PDF file format) - optional
d. Supplemental References (PDF file format) – required
e. Legends for Video files (PDF file format) - optional
f. Video Files (acceptable file formats are: avi, mov, mpg at max 10 MB; if larger, create and upload zip file) - optional

Supplemental Materials Required for Review

MANUSCRIPT REVISIONS  

 

JOURNAL POLICIES

Editorial Conflict-of-Interest Policy.

Prior Publication and Overlapping Work

 

a. The published or submitted abstract must accompany the submitted manuscript.

b. The abstract in question cannot be longer than 400 words.

c. The abstract cannot itself have been referenced in MEDLINE or PubMed.

d. The potentially overlapping work and a separate explanation of the nature of any possible overlap with the submitted manuscript must accompany the submitted manuscript.

These restrictions generally do not apply to presentations or press reports published in connection with scientific meetings, or to poster presentations at scientific meetings that are videotaped, provided that the material has not been widely circulated, copyrighted, or sold. Posting an audio recording, video recording, or short summary of a presentation made at a professional meeting on the Internet would be considered as a meeting presentation by the American Heart Association and would not compromise consideration of a submission. Direct release of information through press releases or media briefings may preclude publication.

Data Deposition and Data Availability

a. Preparation of Data: Submitted data should follow the MIAME checklist (for more information see http://www.mged.org/Workgroups/MIAME/miame_checklist.html). 

b. Accessibility of Data: Authors of papers that include genomic, proteomic, or other high-throughput data are required to make their data easily accessible to the reviewers and the editors during the review process. You may submit your data to the NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository (GEO, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) and provide the GEO accession number; or, you may provide a link to a secure or publicly accessible website that hosts the data. Prior to publication, the data must be submitted and an accession number obtained. Access to the information in the database must be available at the time of publication. GEO has a web-based submission route, suitable for a small number of samples, or a batch submission tool (called SOFT). GEO is accessible from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/. Submission FAQ is at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/geo/info/faq.html. 

c.  Newly reported nucleotide or protein sequences must be deposited in GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Genbank/index.html), EMBL (http://www.ebi.ac.uk), or DNA Data Bank of Japan (http://www.ddbj.nig.ac.jp) databases, and an accession number must be obtained. Access to the information in the database must be available at the time of publication. Authors are responsible for arranging release of data at the time of publication. The authors must also provide a statement in the manuscript that this sequence has been scanned against the database and all sequences with significant relatedness to the new sequence identified (and their accession numbers included in the text of the manuscript).

GenBank

GenBank Submissions
National Center for Biotechnology Information
8600 Rockville Pike, Building 38A
Room 8N-805
Bethesda, MD 20894
Tel: (301) 496-2475
On the web at:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Genbank/index.html

EMBL Nucleotide Sequence Submissions


European Bioinformatics Institute
Hinxton Hall
Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK
Tel.: 44-1223-494401; Fax: 44-1223-494472
e-mail:
support{at}ebi.ac.uk
On the web at:
http://www.ebi.ac.uk

DNA Data Bank of Japan


Center for Information Biology
National Institute of Genetics
Mishima, Shizuoka, 411, Japan
Tel.: 81-559-81-6853; Fax: 81-559-81-6849
On the web at:
http://www.ddbj.nig.ac.jp

Submission to any data bank is sufficient to ensure entry in all.

a.   In accordance with the Clinical Trial Registration Statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (Circulation. 2005;111:1337) and (http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/NEJMe078110), all clinical trials must be registered in a public trials registry at or before the onset of participant enrollment. This requirement applies to all clinical trials that begin enrollment after July 1, 2005.

b.  Research is considered to be a clinical trial if it involves prospective assignment of human subjects to an intervention or comparison group to study the relation between a health-related intervention and a health outcome. Studies that are designed for other purposes, such as to study pharmacokinetics or major toxicity (e.g., phase 1 trials), are exempt.

c.     The registry must be accessible to the public at no charge, searchable, open to all prospective registrants, and managed by a not-for-profit organization. The registry must include the following information: a unique identifying number, a statement of the intervention(s), study hypothesis, definition of primary and secondary outcome measurements, eligibility criteria, target number of subjects, funding source, contact information for the principal investigator, and key dates (registration date, start date, and completion date). The registry sponsored by the United States National Library of Medicine (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov) meets these requirements and is recommended by the editors.

Other registries are acceptable if they meet these requirements. In addition to www.clinicaltrials.gov
, the following registries are recommended by the ICMJE:
1)  http://isrctn.org
2)
http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index/htm
3)
http://www.actr.org.au
4)
http://www.trialregister.nl

In accordance with the ICMJE’s recommendation, we will also accept registration of clinical trials in any of the primary registers that participate in the World Health Organization’s International Clinical Trial Registry Platform. Primary registers are WHO selected registers managed by not-for-profit entities that will accept registrations for any interventional trials, delete duplicate entries from their own register, and provide data directly to the WHO. Please note that registration in any WHO partner registers is insufficient.

d.         The authors will be requested to provide the exact URL and unique identification number for the trial registration at the time of submission. Since this information will be published in a footnote on the first page of the article, we ask that you include the URL and identification number on the title page of your manuscript.

e.         Clinical trial reports should also comply with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) and include a flow diagram presenting the enrollment, intervention allocation, follow-up, and data analysis with number of subjects for each (http://www.consort-statement.org/?o=1011). Please also refer specifically to the CONSORT Checklist of items to include when reporting a randomized clinical trial.

f.           Results posted in the same clinical trials registry in which the primary registration resides will not be considered prior publication if they are presented in the form of a brief abstract (<500 words or less) or a table.

To allow others to replicate and build on work published in Circulation Research, we recommend that authors make materials, data, and associated protocols available to readers. Authors must disclose upon submission of the manuscript any restrictions on the availability of materials or information. We recommend that authors make unique materials (e.g. cloned DNAs; antibodies; bacterial, animal or plant cells; viruses; computer programs) promptly available on request by qualified researchers for their own use. It is reasonable for authors to charge a modest amount to cover the cost of preparing and shipping the requested materials.

 Compliance With NIH and Other Research Funding Agency Accessibility Requirement

a.   The US National Institutes of Health (NIH) requires authors to deposit post-prints of articles, which have received NIH funding, in its repository PubMed Central (PMC). This deposit should be done within the 12 months after publication of the final article in the journal.

b.   The Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) requires, as a condition of research grants, deposit in PMC, but within 6 months after publication of the final article.

c.   The Wellcome Trust requires, as a condition of research grants, deposit in UK PMC within 6 months after publication of the final article.

a.     Author(s) will not deposit their articles themselves.

b.     Author(s) will not alter the post-print already transmitted to NIH.

c.     Author(s) will not authorize the display of the post-print prior to: (1) 12 months after publication of the final article, in the case of NIH, (2) 6 months after publication of the final article, in the case of HHMI and the Wellcome Trust.

Embargo Policy

Permission to Reproduce Published Materials

1.     Go to Circulation Research online.
2.     Open the article abstract.
3.     On the right side of the web page in the vertical gray bar under “Services,” click on the “Request Permission.”

Costs to Authors

Other Useful Links

Authorship Responsibility and Copyright Transfer Agreement Form

Acknowledgment Permission Form

Disclosures Questionnaire

Subject Code List for Classification in Circulation Research Online Article Collections

AHA Scientific Publishing Disclosures Policy

AHA Scientific Publishing Ethical Conduct Policy